<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Suggestion Box — Global Mapper Forum</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 09:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>Suggestion Box — Global Mapper Forum</description>
    <atom:link href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/categories/suggestion-box/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Option to open Surpac .str and .dtm files</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/16313/option-to-open-surpac-str-and-dtm-files</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 04:41:02 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>CarrickCon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">16313@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[G'day. <br /><br />Working in mining I frequently have clients send me .str and .dtm files that they have generated in Surpac which is very common (and expensive!) mining software here in Australia (see <a rel="nofollow" href="/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.3ds.com%2Fproducts-services%2Fgeovia%2Fproducts%2Fsurpac%2F">https://www.3ds.com/products-services/geovia/products/surpac/</a> for details). <br /><br />Given its cost I don't own Surpac but would very much like to be able to open such files in GM (V22.1). Can anyone open these files currently in GM or could these file formats please be added as part of a future version? <br /><br />Cheers,<br />/al<br /><br />P.S. I tried attaching sample .str and .dtm files to this post, but the interface wouldn't allow me to do for some reason??? I'm happy to email samples to anyone that private messages me...<br /><br /> <br />]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>FlatGeobuf export</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17408/flatgeobuf-export</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 18:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>JSL</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17408@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I'd like to request adding the ability to export to FlatGeobuf.  I'm learning how to make an online map, and that format appears to work the best.  RIght now I'm exporting geopackage from GM to QGIS and then exporting it from QGIS to FGB.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for the support.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Is linux support planned for the future?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17404/is-linux-support-planned-for-the-future</link>
        <pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 07:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>peterdian</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17404@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Since the whole Windows 11 fiasco and MS datamining on users data, is there any kind of planned support for linux in the future? It would be really awesome if yes.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>suggestions in grouping,label of lidar data,symbology system</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17395/suggestions-in-grouping-label-of-lidar-data-symbology-system</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 05:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>LittleSANTA</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17395@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>A few feature suggestions for improvement:</p><p>Add sub-grouping functionality within existing groups for better data management.For example, different projects contain different data types, and each data type has a large number of datasets that require further classification.I strongly recommend supporting nested groups or subfolders inside groups.</p><p>Add label support for LiDAR point cloud data, similar to how labels work for vector data.This will make it much easier to locate and inspect abnormal points.Regarding potential performance issues caused by labels, that decision should be left to the user, rather than the software simply freezing or crashing.</p><p>Allow LiDAR point cloud data to recognize custom attributes/fields.Some additional columns are used as auxiliary information and should be readable and usable in the software.</p><p>The symbology system is outdated and lacks functionality and styles.I strongly recommend upgrading the symbology system to be on par with QGIS and ArcGIS, with more styling options and better rendering control.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Buffer Tool - Create Line features instead of Area features</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/15712/buffer-tool-create-line-features-instead-of-area-features</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 00:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>DerrickW</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">15712@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Good Afternoon - Would it be possible to add an option to the "create buffers" tool for the resulting feature to be a line feature instead of an area feature?  <br /><br />I'm not sure about other users, but about half the time I use the tool, my next step is to convert the area feature to a line feature and change the feature type, then delete the area buffer feature. ]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>TIN export in HDF5 (.h5)</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/11436/tin-export-in-hdf5-h5</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2014 23:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>Andy Wizma</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">11436@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[One of the absolute best things about GM is it's Tinning algorithm (I think Delaunay 2D?), it happily handles millions of points and triangulates them in no time at all.  The bottle-neck is getting the resulting TIN out into other programs; .DXF is all but useless and .DWG is only marginally better when handling large TINs.<br /><br /><br />
Can I suggest HDF5 (.h5) format as a very useful output format, in particular (for us flood modellers) it would be fantastic to have it in the .h5 Scatterset format used by Aquaveo's Surfacewater Modelling System (SMS).  Happy to send on over any sample.h5 files etc etc.<br /><br /><br />
Many thanks, Andy]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Flythrough Pitch</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17362/flythrough-pitch</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 13:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>Johno</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17362@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Feature request to decouple "Pitch" from "Fixed Direction" in the flythrough settings.</p><p>The use case example: Follow the path looking straight ahead on the path heading, but pitched down some amount.</p><p>In "Straight Ahead" you can't shift-select multiple points in the dialogue to set pitch in one move, so each individual point has to be double-clicked and manually edited in the separate window that comes up. </p><p>In "Fixed Direction" the pitch for the whole column can be set, but you lose all the path headings to the single non-zero heading required for that column (wild cards don't seem to work here).</p><p>The path can be manually edited externally but it's an onerous process of exporting to text, editing in Excel, converting your desired degrees to radians, in the correct column, and importing the line back in with fields 4-8 enabled for flythrough. For trial and error of different pitch angles it's a pain to keep repeating.</p><p>A quick pitch degree only input and click would be good</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/Z8P666XK7CKX/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/Z8P666XK7CKX/image.png" alt="image.png" height="718" width="1302" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p><br /></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>3D Navigation - Pivot Point</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/14718/3d-navigation-pivot-point</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2018 16:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>DerrickW</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">14718@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Good Morning, <br /><br />I use Pix4d to produce point clouds, and the controls to navigate in the 3D space are very intuitive and functional.  The main feature that I like in Pix4d is that the Pan, zoom and especially the rotate function pivot around whatever point your mouse was hovering over when clicked.  <br /><br />Here's an example - <a rel="nofollow" href="/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FNHwI8yJk7A4" title="Link: /home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FNHwI8yJk7A4">3D Navigation in Pix4d</a><br /><br />In global mapper, the rotate function seems to only pivot around the center of the model or the center of the current view.  Especially on large project sites, this is difficult to work with while digitizing features.  Here's an example of 3D navigation in Global Mapper's 3D view on a corridor project - <a rel="nofollow" href="/home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FHTFT_BAeM6s" title="Link: /home/leaving?allowTrusted=1&amp;target=https%3A%2F%2Fyoutu.be%2FHTFT_BAeM6s">3D Navigation in Global Mapper</a><br /><br />Would it be possible to add an option that lets pan/zoom/rotate pivot around the current mouse position?  <br /><br />Thanks]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>MLE: Element Properties/Layers/Include All Workspace Layers Ticked/Unticked</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17307/mle-element-properties-layers-include-all-workspace-layers-ticked-unticked</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 08:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>CarrickCon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17307@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Blue Marblers,</p><p>Much as I love GM, so many of my frustrations relate to the Map Layout Editor! Grr! As a consulting engineer I need to present figures and drawings with my reports to support the analysis or design completed and I find it frustrating when I can't do this directly in GM due to bugs or minor annoyances! Its a complete waste of time to have to export to AutoCAD etc. when GM should be able to do it...</p><p>Today's frustration relates to the "Include All Workspace Layers in the Layout" in the MLE Element Properties checklist. When this was introduced to the MLE a few versions ago this was a huge step forward and meant that you could confidently save your figure template and not have to re-create it from scratch if for some reason GM "loses" your figures (yes, this still happens to me regularly!) or say you want to add it as a new/additional layout (New Layout/Add a new page...). </p><p>However, it seems in GM 26.1 when I select a template file previously saved with the "Include all workspaces..." tick box <strong>UNTICKED</strong> (as shown in upper screenshot below) to reuse it for another figure it opens up with the tick box <strong>TICKED and all layers selected</strong> (as shown in lower screen shot below). This basically means that we are back to where we were a few versions ago and have to manually select every layer that we previously displayed in a figure! </p><p>BTW - It also happens with the MLE legend which seems to forget the selected layers in the saved template and now displays all layers when the template is re-used (refer to third and fourth screenshots below).</p><p>I have deleted my earlier GM versions, but I'm pretty sure that wasn't happening in GM 25 but unfortunately I can't test it... </p><p>Could you guys please fix this so that once a MLE figure template is saved it "stores or remembers" the selected layers to display and the correct legend layers?  It would also be awesome if a saved template could "remember" the map scale and the Map Centre Point (this has annoyed me since GM 16/17 - I use a workaround recently published on the forum where I create a layer with "centre points" for each figure to save a lot of swearing).</p><p>Okay rant over. I still love this software but I swear some days..🤯.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>/al</p><p><br /></p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/LDB9XTOU8ME6/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/LDB9XTOU8ME6/image.png" alt="image.png" height="486" width="455" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/OB6DBL9H4174/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/OB6DBL9H4174/image.png" alt="image.png" height="495" width="471" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/7TW69KRTLX8B/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/7TW69KRTLX8B/image.png" alt="image.png" height="533" width="406" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/6D1APD173GBR/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/6D1APD173GBR/image.png" alt="image.png" height="774" width="401" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p><br /></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>CSV - Import / Export</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17114/csv-import-export</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>946</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17114@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p><p>IIt would be nice to add this 2 options for .csv files.</p><p>1- When importing csv files to have the option to keep the coordinates columns as attributes as well.</p><p>In this moment when we import and indicate what columns to use as x and y and to keep all attributes, the 2 columns used as coordinates will disappear from the attribute list.</p><p>2- When exporting csv files to have the option to switch the x and y columns (not only their name). In some parts of the world x is assumed as north/latitude and is always first coordinate so a lot of applications are asking for this type of input format.</p><p>In this moment we have to manually switch the columns in the exported csv files.</p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks,</p><p>All the best!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Export selected features</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/11310/export-selected-features</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2014 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>geomannie</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">11310@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Hi<br /><br />
Would be possible to have the option for when exporting vector data, to only export the selected features? I often want to export a subset of the loaded vectors and rather than switching off numerous layers, it is easier to select just the ones you want. Perhaps an option on the export format dialogue as shown?<br /><br />
Thanks<br /><br />
geomannie<br /><a rel="nofollow" href="/categories/suggestion-box/feed.rss#">Attachment not found.</a>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Are there plans for the learning engine to create 3d models of buildings from a DSM &amp; Photography?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17260/are-there-plans-for-the-learning-engine-to-create-3d-models-of-buildings-from-a-dsm-photography</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 10:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>neilcooper33</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17260@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi ,</p><p>This would be a really useful feature for me, </p><p>ie. for the learning engine would be able to provide 3d models of pitched roof houses and flat roofed office blocks based on DSM and Aerial only (this data is easily available for most of the world.</p><p>I'm hoping that the deep learning feature could look at the aerial photography shadows on the roof, and apply pitches to any pitched roofs based on that.... etc. </p><p>the DSM could provide minimum and maximum heights of course.</p><p>let me know what you think :)</p><p>thanks in advance</p><p>Neil</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Choose text halo color</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17057/choose-text-halo-color</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2024 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>PaulMac</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17057@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add to the call for users to be able to select the halo color for text.</p><p>Alternatively a stronger color such as black rather than the current pale grey.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Performance System Tool Testing'~~forhelp</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/16487/performance-system-tool-testing-forhelp</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2021 02:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>denniy</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">16487@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Torrent download ICAMPost v21 Trimble Inpho UASMaster v12 OptiFDTD v15 Simplant Pro v18.5 Materialise.3-matic v15.0</p><p>-----mialto#list.ru-----change "#" to "@"-----</p><p>Just for a test,anything you need-----</p><p>GuideMia v4.8</p><p>AEGIS v0.19.65.505</p><p>AnyBody Modeling System v7.3.1 x64</p><p>ASAP v2020</p><p>AGI Systems Tool Kit (STK) 11.7 x64</p><p>aprinter v2016</p><p>Amada AP100 v7.0</p><p>Amberg Tunnel v2.17</p><p>Analyze v12.0</p><p>Anatomage Invivo dental v5.4</p><p>Aldec Active-HDL v10.4.183.6396</p><p>Anylogic 8.7.7 x64</p><p>aspenONE v12</p><p>ATP-EMTP v6.1</p><p>ATK.Magic.Tool.Suite v7.43.Win</p><p>Attributestudio VVA 2020</p><p>BobCad Cam v33 SP3</p><p>BAE ShipWeight Enterprise 13.0 x64</p><p>bysoft v7.2.0.1</p><p>Certainty3D Topodot v11.5 x64</p><p>CYMCAP 9.0</p><p>CLC Genomics Workbench 21.0.5</p><p>cgg geovation v2016</p><p>CMG Suite v2020</p><p>cnckad v17</p><p>CodeV 11.5</p><p>c-tech evs2020</p><p>Coventor MEMS+ 4.0</p><p>Coventor SEMulator3D 8.0 x64</p><p>Coventor.CoventorWare.2016.v10.1.Win</p><p>Crystal Prod 2019</p><p>crystal specman thinman v2015.1</p><p>Crosslight APSYS v2018 x64</p><p>CrossLight Pics3D v2020 x64</p><p>Datamine Discover v2021 build 21.1.281</p><p>Datamine datablast 2.2.3.8 x64</p><p>DATAM COPRA RF v2009</p><p>DATEM Summit Evolution v7.7 2020</p><p>DesignBuilder v7.0.0.084</p><p>Depth Insight v2015</p><p>Deswik.Suite v2021 x64</p><p>DHI Mike zero 2021</p><p>DHI Feflow 2021 v7.5.75</p><p>DNV Sesam 2021 x64</p><p>DNV GL AS Phast&amp;Safeti 8.4</p><p>DDS FEMtools v5.0</p><p>Digsilent PowerFactory v2020</p><p>Dionisos v4.2</p><p>Dolphin Imaging v11.8</p><p>drillbench v2016.1.1</p><p>Dynel 2D Dynel 3D</p><p>Dyadem Phapro v7.0</p><p>eFilm Workstation v4.2</p><p>ERDAS IMAGINE 2022</p><p>ERDAS ORIMA 2022 </p><p>Earthimager2d3d ZondRes2d Res2Dinv</p><p>EMTP-RV v6.1</p><p>Ensoft LPile v2018.10.02</p><p>Encom ModelVision v17.0 </p><p>Tensor Research ModelVision v17.5  </p><p>Earth Volumetric Studio v2020.5</p><p>Envirosim BioWin 6.2.5</p><p>Engineered Software PIPE-FLO Pro v17.5</p><p>epoffice v2021</p><p>EFI Fiery v7.0</p><p>ArtiosCAD Enterprise v20.0 build 1553</p><p>PackEdge-Plaot 18.1</p><p>Etap PowerStation v20.6 x64</p><p>ETA Inventium PreSys 2020R1 x64</p><p>Fabricator v2013 </p><p>FlexiSIGN &amp; PRINT v12.2</p><p>Fracman v7.8</p><p>forward.net v3.0 2019</p><p>Frontline Analytic Solver 2020</p><p>Fracpro v2021</p><p>GC-PowerStation v17.2</p><p>Geneious Prime v2021.2.2</p><p>GEOSLOPE GeoStudio 2021R2 v11.1.1</p><p>Geochemist Workbench v11.0.8</p><p>geomodeling attributestudio v2019</p><p>Geographix GeoGraphix discovery 2019.4</p><p>Geosyn v2016.1</p><p>GeoSLAM hub 6.0.2</p><p>Paradigm Geolog 2020</p><p>GeoMap v4.0</p><p>GEO5 v2020</p><p>GEOVIA Surpac v2021</p><p>GEOVIA MineSched v2021</p><p>GeoModeller 2019 v4.0.7 x64</p><p>GeoTeric SVI 2021</p><p>GOHFER v9.2</p><p>GOGEO FracPredictor v2014</p><p>Green Hills MULTI for MIPS v4.2.1 </p><p>Green Mountain mesa v15</p><p>GT-SUITE v2020</p><p>Gxplorer v2021</p><p>Hampson Russell Suite 10.6</p><p>HONEYWELL.UniSim.Design.Suite.R460.1</p><p>Hydromantis.GPS-X.v8.0.1 Win</p><p>HydroComp NavCad v2021</p><p>HYPACK v2020</p><p>IMST Empire XPU v8.1.1</p><p>Interactive Petrophysics v4.7</p><p>Innovyze InfoWorks ICM 2021.1 x64</p><p>IBM Rational Tau And DOORS Analyst v4.3</p><p>IBM Rational SDL and TTCN Suite v6.3</p><p>IBM.Rational.DOORs v9.2</p><p>Icaros IPS v4.2</p><p>ICAMPost v22</p><p>IGI ParCAM v8.82</p><p>IHS Petra 2021 v3.15.2</p><p>ihs subpump 2018 v1.0</p><p>IHS Harmony 2021</p><p>IHS welltest 2019</p><p>InterWell v2019.1 </p><p>IHS QUE$TOR 2020.1 v20.1</p><p>Imagestation SSK v2015</p><p>Insight Earth v3.5 x64</p><p>Invivo v6</p><p>Itasca Griddle v2.0</p><p>Itasca UDEC v7.00.50 x64</p><p>JMAG-Designer v20.1</p><p>Jason WorkBench 11.0.1</p><p>JewelSuite Subsurface Modeling v2019.4</p><p>JETCAM EXPERT V15.6</p><p>justcgm v5.1</p><p>Kappa Workstation v5.4001</p><p>KBC Petro-SIM 7.2</p><p>The Kingdom Software 2020</p><p>Kongsberg LedaFlow Engineering v2.6</p><p>Lantek Expert v28</p><p>Leica Infinity 3.6.0</p><p>Leica Cyclone v2021 x64</p><p>Leica CloudWorx v2021</p><p>Landmark DecisionSpace Geosciences 10.ep.4.04</p><p>Landmark Engineer Desktop(EDT) 5000.16</p><p>LDRA TestBed v9.4.1</p><p>Lead v4.0</p><p>LFM.Server v5.3.0 x64</p><p>Lighttools v9.1</p><p>linkmaster v3.0.84</p><p>LucidShape v2.1</p><p>MagiCAD v2018</p><p>MapMatrix v4.2</p><p>Maptek vulcan v10.1 x64</p><p>Maptek I-Site Studio 7.0.5</p><p>Materialise.3-matic v15.0 x64</p><p>Materialise e-Stage v7.3 x64 </p><p>DENTSPLY Simplant Pro v18.5 x64</p><p>Materialise SimPlant O&amp;O v3.0</p><p>MicroSurvey FieldGenius v11.0.2</p><p>MagneForce v5.1</p><p>Meyer v2019</p><p>MEMRESEARCH EM3DS V2010 11.0</p><p>MindCAD 2D&amp;3D v2018</p><p>Mician uWave Wizard 2020 v9.0</p><p>MineSight v2017 x64</p><p>midas xd v5.0</p><p>Motorcad v12.2.5</p><p>MVTec HALCON 21.05</p><p>NCG CAM v18.0</p><p>NovAtel Waypoint Inertial Explorer v8.9</p><p>Napa v2020</p><p>norsar v2020</p><p>Neuralog v2020</p><p>Oasys.Suite 18.1 x64</p><p>OMNI 3D v2020 x64 </p><p>OpendTect v6.6</p><p>Optima Opty-way CAD v7.4 </p><p>openflow v2021 </p><p>Optisystem v18.0 x64</p><p>Optispice v5.3.1 x64</p><p>OptiBPM v13.0 x64</p><p>Optiwave OptiFDTD v15.0 x64</p><p>Orcaflex v11</p><p>ORA CODE V v11.5</p><p>Optimal.Solutions.Sculptor.v3.0</p><p>Optenni Lab v4.3 x64</p><p>PaleoScan v2021</p><p>DecisionTools Suite v8.1</p><p>Palisade Decision Tools Suite v8.1</p><p>Paulin Research Group 2019</p><p>Paradigm Geolog 2020</p><p>Paradigm Epos v2020</p><p>Paradigm Sysdrill v11</p><p>PC-DMIS v2020</p><p>petrosys v2019.3</p><p>PerGeos v2020</p><p>petra v4.0.11</p><p>Petroleum Experts IPM v12</p><p>PLS-CADD v16.8</p><p>PHOTOMOD v5.21</p><p>photomesh v7.4</p><p>PhotoModeler Scanner &amp; Motion v2016</p><p>Pinnacle stimpro v10.9.40</p><p>Pipe Flow Expert v7.4</p><p>PIPE-FLO Pro v17.5</p><p>pix4d v4.6</p><p>PointCab 4Revit 1.4.3 x64</p><p>PLCLogix 2015.09.29</p><p>Polar.Instruments.Si8000.2016.v16.05 </p><p>Polar.Instruments.Si9000.2016.v16.05 </p><p>Polar.Instruments.Speedstack.2016.v16.01 </p><p>prism Interpret v2014</p><p>Prokon v3.0 SP DC 02.08.2018</p><p>PVTsim Nova v5.0 x64</p><p>psse psse v34</p><p>PSCAD v4.6.2</p><p>PSDTO3D v9.9</p><p>PVsyst v7.0</p><p>Radimpex tower7 v7.5.20</p><p>Remcom Wireless InSite 3.3.1 x64</p><p>REFLEXW 9.5</p><p>rhapsody v9.0</p><p>RISA-3D v18.0 x64</p><p>Riegl RiSCAN Pro v2.1 64bit</p><p>Romax Designer R20</p><p>Roxar RMS 2021 v12.1</p><p>RokDoc 2020.1.1</p><p>RSoft 2020</p><p>SCADE Suite R17.3</p><p>Schlumberger ECLIPSE v2021 Win64</p><p>Schlumberger Petrel v2020 Win64</p><p>Schlumberger.PIPESIM 2020.1 x64</p><p>Schlumberger OFM v2021</p><p>Schlumberger OLGA 2020 x64</p><p>Schlumberger INTERSECT v2019</p><p>Schlumberger petromod v2020 x64</p><p>Schlumberger InSitu Pro v2.0</p><p>Schlumberger Techlog v2021</p><p>Schlumberger IAM 2018 Win64</p><p>Senergy Interactive Petrophysics v4.7</p><p>Secure Hydraulics v2011</p><p>SegdToolbox v1.2</p><p>sendra v2015.2</p><p>SES CDEGS v17</p><p>sheetworks V21</p><p>SeisMod 4 SIMO4.2</p><p>SSI ShipConstructor Suite 2020 x64</p><p>shoemaster v2019</p><p>Sherlock v7.212 +Inspect</p><p>SimSci PROII v10.2 Win64</p><p>Simulation admet predictor v9.0</p><p>SKM PowerTools v8</p><p>SNT.QualNet.Developer.6.1.Win</p><p>SolidPlant 3D v2020</p><p>SOCET SET v5.6</p><p>SPT wellflo v8.3</p><p>SOCET GXP v4.2.0</p><p>SPEAG.SEMCAD.X.Matterhorn.19.2.2 x64</p><p>Stoner Pipeline Simulator(SPS) v10.4.0</p><p>Structure Studios VIP3D Suite v2.511 x64</p><p>TEBIS.CADCAM.V4.0</p><p>TechWiz LCD 3D v16</p><p>Tesseral Pro v5.1.4</p><p>Testif-i v2.07a</p><p>Thermo Scientific Open Inventor Toolkit 10.9.3</p><p>TomoPlus v5.9 linux</p><p>tomodel v8.0</p><p>tNavigator v2021</p><p>TICRA Tools 20.0</p><p>TRC Phdwin v2.10</p><p>Trimble EdgeWise v5.1</p><p>Trimble Business Center v5.52 Win64</p><p>Trimble RealWorks v12</p><p>Trimble Inpho Photogrammetry v12 Win64</p><p>Trimble Inpho UASMaster v12 x64</p><p>Trimble Vico Office R6.8</p><p>Ucamco Ucamx v2021</p><p>UBC-GIF 5.0</p><p>vxworks v7</p><p>vpi transmission maker v11 x64</p><p>VPIphotonics Design Suite Expert v11</p><p>Waterloo AquiferTest Pro v10.0 x64</p><p>Waterloo Visual MODFLOW Flex v7.0</p><p>zemax v2020.3</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Curves on a line</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17182/curves-on-a-line</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2024 18:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>RGBrown</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17182@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Using GM v22.1 64 bit plus Lidar.</p><p>When defining a pipeline route GM is really good for the IP's and the Vertex Editor works very well. However defining curves for a long pipeline route is a pain. My present workflow puts it in a spreadsheet to compute the tangent points and chord length and bearings. I then use this data in the COGO arc function. EG. Editor output</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/72XUILTWQZRX/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/72XUILTWQZRX/image.png" alt="image.png" height="420" width="1335" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>Into Excel, below is the sheet I have been working on today. Note some columns are hidden.</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/DK81MP9JAFB3/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/DK81MP9JAFB3/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1180" width="2465" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>Saving the curve data to the text file in the COGO input editor produces a file of format:</p><p>C 1730.363 R 2000.0 C N20.02019E R meters. </p><p>However, it only relates to the single curve and I manually put in the N/S &amp; E/W bearing seed which is a pain. Could we use bearings instead? I use grid N in the vertex editor.</p><p>The main question: Is it possible to include the start TP coords of each chord in the saved file?  e.g</p><p>E 463195.95 N 5737220.63 C 1730.363 R 2000.0 C N20.02019E R, from IP15 and then of course assemble all the curves in one file to read all the curves in one go, in this example over 30 curves. A route sample is below.</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/CTZYHKIKRR4P/image.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/CTZYHKIKRR4P/image.png" alt="image.png" height="1270" width="1517" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>I dont have AutoCAD but have been looking at IntelliCAD as a work around, but GM is nearly there, it it just needs a bit of finishing.</p><p>Hopeful regards.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Hydrology Module</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/15913/hydrology-module</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2020 09:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>alienyouth</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">15913@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[Greetings to the Global mapper team. <br /><br />This software is the easiest GIS software i know of in the market and it is usually the first i recommend to my colleagues and clients.<br /><br />I'm a Civil Engineer specializing  in water resources. Please i would like to suggest/request the possibility of an hydrology module being included with Global Mapper, or perhaps a basic tool to automatically compute the longest flow path in a catchment and it's characteristics. We normally need this to design culverts, drains, etc and there is no automatic way to do this right now.<br /><br />This suggestion will go a long way to marketing the software to my clients because i currently use other GIS software for this computation.<br /><br />Kind Regards<br />'Seye Agunbiade]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Curve radii</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17183/curve-radii</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2024 09:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>RGBrown</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17183@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>After inputting lines that will be routes onto the drawing pane and then editing in the Vertex Editor, would it be possible to have the option of adding the curve radii to the IP's in the Vertex Editor and compute the whole route of lines and curves in one go. </p><p>Each IP would have to have the option of different radius as they often change along the route, depending on the minimum bend radii (MBR). Perhaps one dialogue for fill all MBR and another for editing an MBR at the selected IP.</p><p>Hopeful regards</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Bring contours back!</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17186/bring-contours-back</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2024 15:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>yianni</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17186@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I was very dissapointed to see the contour button leaving the standard version of GM.</p><p>It was a very useful function.</p><p>Blue Marble  should be more innovative and try to entise us with new juicy features that Pro has rather than actively make the standard version worse.</p><p>Besides you can very easily create contours on other free GIS software so I am not sure what this achieves.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>OpenCL support</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17184/opencl-support</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2024 00:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>NickV</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17184@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Is there a plan to include OpenCL support for pixels to point processing alongside the current CUDA support?</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Routing data - intersection &amp; turning points, bend radius</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/16440/routing-data-intersection-turning-points-bend-radius</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2021 14:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>aa2105</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">16440@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>We use GM for our routing of pipelines &amp; other infrastructure. For this it is customary to define the route as a list of turning points (TPs), intersection points (IPs) and the associated bend radius. At present, GM does not allow to input or extract this information directly (I can get TPs indirectly). </p><p>It would be a great addition to have this functionality. This can also include user provided limits on bend radius etc. when developing a route. </p><p>If there is a go-around within GM (at the moment we rely on other software), or a 'conversion' using existing capability, would be pleased to know more about it. </p><p>Thanks.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ability to add multiple Map View Elements to Map Layout Editor?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17175/ability-to-add-multiple-map-view-elements-to-map-layout-editor</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 01:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>CarrickCon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17175@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi Blue Marblers,</p><p>The MLE is getting better with each new version of GM and the ability to select and remember layers per Map Layer Editor is a huge step forward in improving its usefulness! </p><p>One suggestion that I'd like to make is could you please consider adding multiple Map View Elements to the MLE? That way you could produce a single figure with fixed background or topo etc. and then display, say four or more, different sets of different vector info in different "windows" on THE SAME FIGURE. </p><p>I do a lot of hydraulic modelling and import the results (vectors and rasters) into GM for display purposes and it would be great to be able to display multiple variables e.g. flow depth, velocity, water surface elevation, flood extents in four "windows" on the same figure rather than having to create a new figure for each variable. When you are modelling multiple scenarios e.g. existing and proposed conditions for 5, 10, 50, 100, 1,000 year events etc. the number of figures really starts to add up.</p><p>My current workaround in GM is to create images of what I want to display and then import them into a single figure in the MLE. Alternatively I import the images into multiple "Viewports" on a single drawing sheet in paper space in AutoCAD.</p><p>Anyhow, would be really helpful... Not sure if there are others out there who need this feature?</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>/al</p><p>P.S. On the same tack the ability to display a profile in the MLE would also be a huge step forward as its often necessary to display both "Plan and Profile" info on the same figure (again my current workaround is to take a screen grab of the profile and then import is as an image into the MLE).</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ability to change / set the vertical datum of a layer before exporting</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17172/ability-to-change-set-the-vertical-datum-of-a-layer-before-exporting</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2024 03:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>LidarDronePilot23</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17172@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I definitely would like to be able to change and / or confirm the vertical datum of a layer before exporting.  I can't believe this isn't already possible the same way I change or set the horizontal datum under tools / configure / projection.  Likewise the ability to change or set the measurement unit of the vertical datum is badly needed.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Windows Metafile (WMF) export from GM please?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17145/windows-metafile-wmf-export-from-gm-please</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2024 07:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>CarrickCon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17145@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>G'day. </p><p>GM already has an extensive range of import/export formats, but I was wondering if there's any chance of adding Windows Metafile (WMF) to that list please for raster export?  </p><p>I use an obscure piece of Australian hydrological software (RORB) that permits importation of drainage network only in WMF. I use GM for all my catchment/flow path delineation and its a pain having to export to another program just to create a WMF.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>/al</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Creating and saving a DEM TIF file from a Resampled file</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17130/creating-and-saving-a-dem-tif-file-from-a-resampled-file</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2024 13:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>amirfarshadfar</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17130@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hi</p><p>I have a question. I have a DEM file with resolution 15 cm and I want to change it to 4 m resolution. Does Global Mapper software have the option to resample the resolution from 15 cm to 4 m resolution and create a DEM TIF file that I could be able to read the elevation data from it using the Global Mapper software?</p><p><br /></p><p>In addition, I checked out some of the website and they introduced that I could use the software ArcMap and I should select in the “Arc toolbox” as following:</p><p>Data Management Tools – Raster – Raster Processing – Resampling</p><p>And from here I changed the resolution X and Y to 4m * 4m</p><p><br /></p><p>When the file is created I select the “File” menu tab and select “Export map” and then save the file as TIF.</p><p><br /></p><p>In this time, when I want to use again the Global Mapper software to read the elevation data as a DEM file, it seems the resampled file data is not completely saved as a DEM TIF data file and it seems it has some problem for opening the file and Global Mapper request "Image Ractifier" to choose 2 ground control points! </p><p><br /></p><p>What should I do? Is there any easy way to resample my DEM TIF data to a new resolution DEM TIF data to read the new elevations? </p><p><br /></p><p>Thanks for your response</p><p>Sincerely</p><p>Amir Farshadfar</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Import structured multi-level KMZ in GM</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17128/import-structured-multi-level-kmz-in-gm</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2024 05:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>Abdoosh</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17128@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>Hello, </p><p>I'm trying  to import a KMZ file that has multi KMZs into it, each has several layers as well, in GM 25. </p><p>The GM combine all levels' features in one single layer!!</p><p>As a comparison, It's imported well in ArcGIS pro (as they shown in Google Earth), and many layers without groups in QGIS.</p><p><br /></p><p>Is there a workaround to have that in GM?</p><p>Thanks in advance.</p><p>-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>Here the KMZ  in Google Earth 👇️</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/7OG8ZU5509LG/ge.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/7OG8ZU5509LG/ge.png" alt="GE.png" height="549" width="400" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>And here are similar in ArcGIS Pro 👇️</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/8Q3LZ8LCM01N/arcgis.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/8Q3LZ8LCM01N/arcgis.png" alt="ArcGIS.png" height="793" width="527" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>Many separated layers in QGIS👇️:</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/281I659590Z1/qgis.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/281I659590Z1/qgis.png" alt="QGIS.png" height="484" width="284" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p><br /></p><p>And Finally here how it shown in Global Mapper (Ver. 25.1)👇️</p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/CLTUOJB9RM7P/gm.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/CLTUOJB9RM7P/gm.png" alt="GM.png" height="505" width="328" data-display-size="medium" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p><br /></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Any way to edit a question or post after submitting?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17126/any-way-to-edit-a-question-or-post-after-submitting</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2024 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>LidarDronePilot23</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17126@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>I just posted my first question on the user forum.  I didn't see any way to edit it after hitting submit.  Does anyone know if this is possible?  Would be nice to be able to re-word or add additional information to a post after the fact...</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Can you turn snapping on/off mid vector creation?</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17115/can-you-turn-snapping-on-off-mid-vector-creation</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:16:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>CarrickCon</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17115@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>G'day GM'ers,</p><p>Is there a way to disable/enable snapping while creating a vector? For instance sometimes its helpful to start and finish creation of a line by snapping to existing points but you don't necessarily want to snap while creating intermediate points.</p><p>I've looked but can't seem to find a way to do this as the snapping option has to be enabled/disabled <strong><em>prior</em></strong> to creating a new vector. It would be a helpful addition if you could please add it.</p><p>I note that Ortho command can be toggled on/off mid vector creation and that is helpful.</p><p>Cheers,</p><p>/al</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Capture &quot;Reset to Last Export Bounds&quot;</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17118/capture-reset-to-last-export-bounds</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>kfroese</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17118@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>On a recent project, I've had to use the "Reset to Last Export Bounds" several times to create drawings for our field technicians over the last month. Fortunately, I haven't printed from any other GM projects so the "Last Export Bounds" remain from this job. It would be nice to save those bounds as a layer so they could easily be reproduced.</p><p>I know I can simply copy the coordinates for a box but a quick right-click would be handier!</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Terrain Painting - Interpolate between two points</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17107/terrain-painting-interpolate-between-two-points</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 23:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>csnoke</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17107@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<p>The current "slope terrain along line" function seems to take the starting elevation and continues it to the end selected line. It would be ideal, if the function took the start elevation and the end elevation of the selected path, and interpolated between those points</p><p>See the graphic below of the current results.</p><p>If I use the line brush to draw between the arrow tips, the function carries the start elevation to the end of the line... causing a vertical face in the DEM. It would be better to use the start and end elevations, and interpolate between them to create a smooth route.</p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p><div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/LRSAUGL2W2HV/untitled-1-recovered.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/LRSAUGL2W2HV/untitled-1-recovered.jpg" alt="Untitled-1-Recovered.jpg" height="1245" width="861" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p><br /></p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Evenly Spread Elevations Between First and Last to the Selected Elevations</title>
        <link>https://www.globalmapperforum.com/discussion/17097/evenly-spread-elevations-between-first-and-last-to-the-selected-elevations</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 18:48:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Suggestion Box</category>
        <dc:creator>nikkrit</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">17097@/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/ZLMAXUZJNAEA/image1.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/ZLMAXUZJNAEA/image1.png" alt="Image1.png" height="633" width="1362" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<div>
    <div>
        <a href="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/2665V4VRERIF/image2.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer noopener ugc" target="_blank">
            <img src="https://www.globalmapperforum.com/uploads/2665V4VRERIF/image2.png" alt="Image2.png" height="630" width="1359" data-display-size="large" data-float="none" /></a>
    </div>
</div>
<p>I'm not sure if there is an other way for this but it would be nice and very-very useful to have the feature: "Evenly Spread Elevations Between First and Last to the Selected Elevations..", because I'd like to have the ability to change the elevations evenly only on the selected vertices.</p>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
